Bond Reduction

Oldham County Criminal Defense Attorney

Unrelenting and aggressive criminal defense for over 17 years handling State Cases, Federal Cases, Bond Reduction Motion, Reduction of Bond Motion, Agreed Bond Motion, Motion for Home Incarceration, Home Incarceration in lieu of Bond, Signature Bond Motion, Bond Partially Secured Motion, Out of County Home Incarceration Motion, Bail Jumping in the First Degree Charge, Bail Jumping Crime, Out of State Home Incarceration Motion, Property Bond Motion, 60 Day Grand jury Motion, Procedure on Failure to Indict, Criminal Rule 5.22 Failure to Indict, Felon 10 Day Rule to Release on your own Recognizance, Felony 20 Day Rule to Release on your Own Recognizance, County Motion for Bond Forfeiture, Commonwealth Motion for Bond Forfeiture, Bond Forfeiture Hearing, Contempt Charge, Contempt Charge Purge Amount, Contempt Charge Bond Reduction, Release If Paid Sentence, Failure to Appear Status, DOT Sanction, Department of Transportation Notice and more.  

Oldham County Bond Reduction Lawyer - Bond Relief Attorney

If you get arrested in or around Oldham County then you need to call and have our Bond Reduction Attorney in Oldham County get your bond set fairly. Setting Bond and asking for Bond Reduction seems simple enough. You are really setting a bond based upon an amalgam of the different parties life experiences coupled with the confines of Kentucky Statute Section 431.525. The Bond Amount shall be 1.) Sufficient to insure compliance with pretrial directives or orders; 2) Not oppressive; 3) Commensurate with the charged offense; 4) Considerate of past criminal history and reasonably anticipated conduct; 5) considerate of the financial wherewithal of the defendant.  

As a local Oldham County criminal defense attorney I know these elements and considerations run together and in some instances they just don't matter. At some point, they have to be aligning themselves with being arbitrary, but the Jefferson District and Circuit Court Judges still must articulate their reasoning. For example, a multi-millionaire charged with murder will post his 1 million dollar bond, and the poor indigent client won't be able to post $50,000. Either bond is commensurate with murder and the inability to make the bond does not make it oppressive. Another example would be two people coming in with a DUI Second. One is an executive with a reputable local company, like UPS, and the Judge sets his bond at $500 or $1000. A person from the less privileged area of Oldham County, say the California Neighborhood or Portland, may have his bond set at $1000, $2000 or more because he was not as established as the former comparison, the executive, and received a bench warrant for failure to pay court costs 8 years ago on a traffic violation. They could easily find that having such a lucrative position would not persuade himself of flight, as in not attending court. However, the other gentleman, having 0 dollars would be a flight risk because he has nothing to lose? There are a lot of different reasons for bonds, bond amounts and a persons background that reaches out to people differently. Some facts and details brought up in bond reduction at Jefferson District Court arraignment court in Oldham County push the envelope on being inanely irrelevant. I've had prosecutors point to bench warrants 8-10 years ago stating that the client does not like court. They opine the client doesn't like court and is a flight risk because of this bench warrant 10 years ago. It is this thinking that is prevalent in court systems throughout the U.S. Like the U.S., Oldham County Criminal District Court Dockets are slammed with these cases it is normally enough for them to know that if they don't show back up their license is suspended.  

As a Bond Reduction Attorney in Oldham County and focusing on Criminal Defense in Kentucky, bond reduction motions can be difficult because of expectations. Bond Reduction and the explanation to clients regarding what they should expect is, very hard, and maybe the hardest part of representation. They see the rules and not all the facts, circumstances and prior hearings heard outside of their presence. Clients understand the general rules, but it is too hard for them to place them into context. So, Bond Reduction is often a part of the process leading to a letdown for your client. And, sometimes they are great! There are some things that raise your chance of Bond Reduction and studies have shown this.   

Raising your chances for Bond Reduction:
A skilled and licensed criminal defense attorney in Oldham County who is respected by the judges. Further, a lawyer who practices in Jefferson Circuit Felony Court or Jefferson District Misdemeanor Court and is respected by his peers. Most importantly, an honest criminal defense attorney who will tell the truth and knows when he can vouch for his clients, because at the end of the day, all an attorney has is his word.   

Every sitting Jefferson County Judge, whether in Jefferson Misdemeanor District Court, Jefferson Felony Circuit Court, Western District of Kentucky or Southern District of Indiana can trust that when I ask for trial date or suppression date, it is meant to be. The Jefferson County District Misdemeanor Attorneys, Jefferson County Commonwealth Felony Attorneys and United States Attorneys prosecutor know I don't withdraw from cases and when I set a trial date, I mean it.   

What I present is what judges, other criminal defense attorneys and my clients charged with some crime, marijuana charge, gun crime, or otherwise, can rely upon. This starts with my appearance and initial bond. Your percentage for bond reduction goes increasingly higher when they know you are retained for the case and they can count on you staying with your client. There is no worries about juggling attorneys down the road because an attorney entered his appearance only to plead not guilty and withdraw from the next pretrial. Again, this reliance on an attorney and his consistency cannot be understated. This is a big reason why I turn down clients all the time because I will not get on a case merely for the purpose of bond reduction (unless it is in custody arraignment on a new arrest).  

Bond reduction and a right to have a bond in the state of Kentucky is absolute. This is one significant variance when moving from Kentucky Courts to Federal Court Systems, Western District of Kentucky. Many cases in Federal Jurisdiction, those that have a mandatory minimum of 10 years to serve, as charged, have a "presumption of detainer." The presumption of detainer on indictments carrying over 10 years creates, very easily, a situation where a client is not given a bond. The Federal Judge, writing an opinion regarding the Defendant, is making a finding that there is no bond that could insure the Defendant would return to Court. This conclusion then equates to there being "No Bond" and the Defendant is whisked to a Federal Hold somewhere in Kentucky or Southern District of Indiana where he awaits trial. Current Federal Holds for Kentucky Inmates federally indicted include, New Albany Jail, LaGrange Jail, Grayson County Detention Center, and the Marion County Jail, in Springfield.  

Unlike Federal Court, Kentucky State Courts mandate a measurable, identifiable bond. Because this is necessary there are several Criminal Rules, 4.04, 4.12 and 4.14 along with several Kentucky Statutes that dictate this process. These give guidelines for setting a bond and go about the three main factors to take into consideration.

Bond Reduction Attorney in Oldham County

If you get arrested in or around Oldham County then you need to call and have our Bond Reduction Attorney in Oldham County get your bond set fairly. Setting Bond and asking for Bond Reduction seems simple enough. You are really setting a bond based upon an amalgam of the different parties life experiences coupled with the confines of Kentucky Statute Section 431.525. The Bond Amount shall be 1.) Sufficient to insure compliance with pretrial directives or orders; 2) Not oppressive; 3) Commensurate with the charged offense; 4) Considerate of past criminal history and reasonably anticipated conduct; 5) considerate of the financial wherewithal of the defendant.  

As a local Oldham County criminal defense attorney I know these elements and considerations run together and in some instances they just don't matter. At some point, they have to be aligning themselves with being arbitrary, but the Jefferson District and Circuit Court Judges still must articulate their reasoning. For example, a multi-millionaire charged with murder will post his 1 million dollar bond, and the poor indigent client won't be able to post $50,000. Either bond is commensurate with murder and the inability to make the bond does not make it oppressive. Another example would be two people coming in with a DUI Second. One is an executive with a reputable local company, like UPS, and the Judge sets his bond at $500 or $1000. A person from the less privileged area of Oldham County, say the California Neighborhood or Portland, may have his bond set at $1000, $2000 or more because he was not as established as the former comparison, the executive, and received a bench warrant for failure to pay court costs 8 years ago on a traffic violation. They could easily find that having such a lucrative position would not persuade himself of flight, as in not attending court. However, the other gentleman, having 0 dollars would be a flight risk because he has nothing to lose? There are a lot of different reasons for bonds, bond amounts and a persons background that reaches out to people differently. Some facts and details brought up in bond reduction at Jefferson District Court arraignment court in Oldham County push the envelope on being inanely irrelevant. I've had prosecutors point to bench warrants 8-10 years ago stating that the client does not like court. They opine the client doesn't like court and is a flight risk because of this bench warrant 10 years ago. It is this thinking that is prevalent in court systems throughout the U.S. Like the U.S., Oldham County Criminal District Court Dockets are slammed with these cases it is normally enough for them to know that if they don't show back up their license is suspended.  

As a Bond Reduction Attorney in Oldham County and focusing on Criminal Defense in Kentucky, bond reduction motions can be difficult because of expectations. Bond Reduction and the explanation to clients regarding what they should expect is, very hard, and maybe the hardest part of representation. They see the rules and not all the facts, circumstances and prior hearings heard outside of their presence. Clients understand the general rules, but it is too hard for them to place them into context. So, Bond Reduction is often a part of the process leading to a letdown for your client. And, sometimes they are great! There are some things that raise your chance of Bond Reduction and studies have shown this.   

Raising your chances for Bond Reduction:
A skilled and licensed criminal defense attorney in Oldham County who is respected by the judges. Further, a lawyer who practices in Jefferson Circuit Felony Court or Jefferson District Misdemeanor Court and is respected by his peers. Most importantly, an honest criminal defense attorney who will tell the truth and knows when he can vouch for his clients, because at the end of the day, all an attorney has is his word.   

Every sitting Jefferson County Judge, whether in Jefferson Misdemeanor District Court, Jefferson Felony Circuit Court, Western District of Kentucky or Southern District of Indiana can trust that when I ask for trial date or suppression date, it is meant to be. The Jefferson County District Misdemeanor Attorneys, Jefferson County Commonwealth Felony Attorneys and United States Attorneys prosecutor know I don't withdraw from cases and when I set a trial date, I mean it.   

What I present is what judges, other criminal defense attorneys and my clients charged with some crime, marijuana charge, gun crime, or otherwise, can rely upon. This starts with my appearance and initial bond. Your percentage for bond reduction goes increasingly higher when they know you are retained for the case and they can count on you staying with your client. There is no worries about juggling attorneys down the road because an attorney entered his appearance only to plead not guilty and withdraw from the next pretrial. Again, this reliance on an attorney and his consistency cannot be understated. This is a big reason why I turn down clients all the time because I will not get on a case merely for the purpose of bond reduction (unless it is in custody arraignment on a new arrest).  

Bond reduction and a right to have a bond in the state of Kentucky is absolute. This is one significant variance when moving from Kentucky Courts to Federal Court Systems, Western District of Kentucky. Many cases in Federal Jurisdiction, those that have a mandatory minimum of 10 years to serve, as charged, have a "presumption of detainer." The presumption of detainer on indictments carrying over 10 years creates, very easily, a situation where a client is not given a bond. The Federal Judge, writing an opinion regarding the Defendant, is making a finding that there is no bond that could insure the Defendant would return to Court. This conclusion then equates to there being "No Bond" and the Defendant is whisked to a Federal Hold somewhere in Kentucky or Southern District of Indiana where he awaits trial. Current Federal Holds for Kentucky Inmates federally indicted include, New Albany Jail, LaGrange Jail, Grayson County Detention Center, and the Marion County Jail, in Springfield.  

Unlike Federal Court, Kentucky State Courts mandate a measurable, identifiable bond. Because this is necessary there are several Criminal Rules, 4.04, 4.12 and 4.14 along with several Kentucky Statutes that dictate this process. These give guidelines for setting a bond and go about the three main factors to take into consideration.
GOAL:

Brendan McLeod's goal is to obtain, and it gets closer every day, the most thorough level of practice from pretrial through jury trial if necessary.  Reorganization of my practice internally has created a very ISO Process feel that insures accounting and markup of evidence.  
We identify the issues and resolve them. My grandfather told me that I would realize some day how to identify certain people that were "more heat than light."  
He commented once that talking to this particular gentleman on the phone was like "trying to nail jello to the wall." Further, he stated that trying to explain the most basic of concepts was distant and he felt the guy was asking him to "describe the color purple."  
He rarely said the same thing twice, but these three quotes I remember, as well as, hundreds more. They are life lessons in context. 
When identifying the issues, trust that we will know who is more heat than light. That some people aren't going to ever listen and even others will never get it no matter how many times you explain it. 
We get it. We will get your situation, as a normal person going through life and its stressors and you, our client, who has a temporary issue that we will resolve.  
It is representing people with "life" going on all around you and you have to deal with it all. We are the best at this and at criminal defense and criminal defense trials.  
Let us help and take the anxiety out of the situation. -Brendan McLeod
Share by: